↓ Skip to main content

Coordination of mastication and swallowing

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, December 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
11 patents

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coordination of mastication and swallowing
Published in
Dysphagia, December 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02493469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey B. Palmer, Nathan J. Rudin, Gustavo Lara, Alfred W. Crompton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Engineering 7 6%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#597
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,407
of 66,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.