↓ Skip to main content

Recombinant retrovirus vectors for the expression of MHC class II heterodimers

Overview of attention for article published in Surgery Today, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recombinant retrovirus vectors for the expression of MHC class II heterodimers
Published in
Surgery Today, June 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02482348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideaki Shimada, Robert C. Alexander, Sharon Germana, David H. Sachs, Christian LeGuern

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Surgery Today
#135
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,954
of 35,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery Today
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.