↓ Skip to main content

The design and application of multifunctional structure-battery materials systems

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The design and application of multifunctional structure-battery materials systems
Published in
JOM, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11837-005-0228-5
Authors

James P. Thomas, Muhammad A. Qidwai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 27%
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 30 31%
Materials Science 14 14%
Chemical Engineering 6 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 39 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#334
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,597
of 61,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.