You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vaccines for women for preventing neonatal tetanus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002959.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vittorio Demicheli, Antonella Barale, Alessandro Rivetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 349 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 17% |
| Unknown | 127 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 140 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,505,561
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,092
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,040
of 277,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.