You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A tabu search heuristic for the quay crane scheduling problem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Scheduling, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10951-007-0029-5 |
| Authors |
Marcello Sammarra, Jean-François Cordeau, Gilbert Laporte, M. Flavia Monaco |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 24 | 35% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 13% |
| Decision Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#22
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,637
of 67,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.