You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, February 2005
|
DOI | 10.1136/jme.2003.007138 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C A Gericke, A Riesberg, R Busse |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 164 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 46 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Researcher | 11 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Unknown | 48 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 17% |
Unknown | 53 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,892,320
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#667
of 3,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,855
of 76,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.