Title |
Comparative investigation on the sizes and scavenger receptor binding of human native and modified lipoprotein particles with atomic force microscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-018-0352-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chaoye Gan, Kun Wang, Qisheng Tang, Yong Chen |
Abstract |
The size and receptor-binding abilities of plasma lipoproteins are closely related with their structure/functions. Presently, the sizes of native lipoproteins have been measured by various methods including atomic force microscopy (AFM) whereas the sizes of modified lipoproteins are poorly determined and the receptor-binding ability of lipoproteins is less detected and compared at the nanoscale. Here, AFM was utilized to detect/compare the size and scavenger receptor-binding properties of three native human lipoproteins including high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and very low-density lipoprotein, and two modified human lipoproteins including oxidized and acetylated LDL, as well as bovine serum albumin and their antibodies as negative and positive controls, respectively. AFM detected that the sizes of these lipoproteins are close to the commonly known values and the previously-reported AFM-detected sizes and that native and modified LDL have different height/size. AFM also revealed that the CD36-binding abilities of the five lipoproteins are different from one another and from their SR-B1-binding abilities and that the anti-CD36/SR-B1 antibodies as positive controls have strong CD36/SR-B1-binding abilities. The data provide important information on lipoproteins for better understanding their structures/functions. Moreover, the data certify that besides size measurement AFM also can visualize receptor-lipoprotein binding at the nanoscale, as well as antigen-antibody (scavenger receptors and their antibodies) binding. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |