↓ Skip to main content

Three proposals to increase Australia’s organ supply

Overview of attention for article published in Monash Bioethics Review, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 155)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three proposals to increase Australia’s organ supply
Published in
Monash Bioethics Review, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40592-015-0030-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Isdale, Julian Savulescu

Abstract

In 2008 the Australian Government introduced a national reform agenda to increase organ and tissue donation. Australia continues to perform poorly by international standards on measures of organ procurement, however. This paper outlines three proposals to improve donation rates and considers the empirical evidence available for each. A number of ethical objections frequently given to resist such proposals are also addressed. Firstly, it is recommended that Australia implement an 'opt-out' system of organ donation. Secondly, the existing veto rules should be changed to better protect the wishes of those who wish to donate. Finally, a numer of incentives should be offered to increase donation rates; these could include incentives of financial value, but also non-financial incentives such as prioritisation for the receipt of organs for previous donors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 39%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Philosophy 5 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#597,741
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Monash Bioethics Review
#9
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,864
of 267,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monash Bioethics Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.