↓ Skip to main content

Cdx-2 polymorphism in the vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) marks VDR expression in monocyte/macrophages through VDR promoter methylation

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cdx-2 polymorphism in the vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) marks VDR expression in monocyte/macrophages through VDR promoter methylation
Published in
Immunogenetics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00251-018-1063-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Meyer, Liza Bornman

Abstract

Caudal-type homeobox protein 2 (CDX-2) is an intestine-specific transcription factor (TF), with a polymorphic binding site (Cdx-2, rs11568820, A/G) in the vitamin D receptor gene (VDR). The molecular mechanism underlying Cdx-2 association with conditions like osteoporosis, which depends on intestinal VDR expression and calcium absorption, is believed to be due to higher affinity of CDX-2 for the ancestral A allele compared to the G allele. However, it is unclear why the polymorphism is associated with diseases like tuberculosis, which is dependent on VDR expression in immune cells that do not express CDX-2. This study aimed to explain Cdx-2 variant association with immune-related conditions. We hypothesised that the effect of Cdx-2 polymorphism on VDR expression in monocytes/macrophages, devoid of the CDX-2 TF, is indirect and dependent on circulating 25(OH)D3 and VDR methylation. Primary monocyte/macrophages from healthy donors (n = 100) were activated though TLR2/1 elicitation. VDR mRNA and 25(OH)D3 were quantified by RT-qPCR and LC-MS/MS, respectively. Genotyping and methylation analysis were done by pyrosequencing. AA vs. AG/GG showed reduced levels of 25(OH)D3 (P < 0.010), higher VDR promoter methylation (P < 0.050) and lower VDR mRNA induction (P < 0.050). Analysis of covariance confirmed that the effect of Cdx-2 variants depends primarily on VDR methylation. Thus, VDR methylation may confound association studies linking VDR polymorphisms to disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,632,069
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#1,032
of 1,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,756
of 330,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.