↓ Skip to main content

“Artificial micro organs”—a microfluidic device for dielectrophoretic assembly of liver sinusoids

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Artificial micro organs”—a microfluidic device for dielectrophoretic assembly of liver sinusoids
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10544-011-9517-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Schütte, Britta Hagmeyer, Felix Holzner, Massimo Kubon, Simon Werner, Christian Freudigmann, Karin Benz, Jan Böttger, Rolf Gebhardt, Holger Becker, Martin Stelzle

Abstract

In order to study possible toxic side effects of potential drug compounds in vitro a reliable test system is needed. Predicting liver toxicity presents a major challenge of particular importance as liver cells grown in a cell culture suffer from a rapid loss of their liver specific functions. Therefore we are developing a new microfluidic test system for liver toxicity. This test system is based on an organ-like liver 3D co-culture of hepatocytes and endothelial cells. We devised a microfluidic chip featuring cell culture chambers with integrated electrodes for the assembly of liver sinusoids by dielectrophoresis. Fluid channels enable an organ-like perfusion with culture media and test compounds. Different chamber designs were studied and optimized with regard to dielectrophoretic force distribution, hydrodynamic flow profile, and cell trapping rate using numeric simulations. Based on simulation results a microchip was injection-moulded from COP. This chip allowed the assembly of viable hepatocytes and endothelial cells in a sinusoid-like fashion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 118 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 31%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 31 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,375,523
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#207
of 745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,571
of 106,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.