↓ Skip to main content

Health and Healing: Spiritual, Pharmaceutical, and Mechanical Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health and Healing: Spiritual, Pharmaceutical, and Mechanical Medicine
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10943-011-9545-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard A. Hutch

Abstract

Modern medical practice is identified as a relatively recent way of approaching human ill health in the wide scope of how people have addressed sickness throughout history and across a wide range of cultures. The ideological biases of medical or "allopathic" (disease as "other" or "outsider") practice are identified and grafted onto other perspectives on how people not engaged in modern medicine have achieved healing and health. Alternative forms of healing and health open a consideration of ethnomedicine, many forms of which are unknown and, hence, untested by modern medical research. Ethnomedicine the world over and throughout human history has displayed unique spiritual (vitalism), pharmaceutical (herbs/drugs), and mechanical (manipulation/surgery) approaches to treating illness. The argument is that modern allopathic medicine would do well to consider such "world medicine" as having valuable alternative and complementary therapies, the use of which could enhance contemporary medical advice and practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2011.
All research outputs
#14,512,167
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#617
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,154
of 143,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.