You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple loci not only Rf3 involved in the restoration ability of pollen fertility, anther exsertion and pollen shedding to S type cytoplasmic male sterile in maize
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-015-2589-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Feng, Qi Zheng, Hui Song, Yi Wang, Hui Wang, Lijing Jiang, Jianbing Yan, Yonglian Zheng, Bing Yue |
| Abstract |
Thirty loci for fertility restoration of pollen fertility, anther exsertion and pollen shedding to maize CMS-S were identified by GWAS. S type cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS-S) is the main type of CMS in maize; poor understanding of the genetic architecture of fertility restoration to CMS-S is one of the reasons to impede its utility in hybrid breeding. In this study, genome-wide identification of genetic loci for fertility restoration ability to CMS-S was firstly conducted with a set of testcrossing association mapping panel in three environments. A total of 19, 3 and 8 significant loci (P < 1.8 × 10(-6), α = 1) for pollen fertility, anther exsertion and pollen shedding were identified, respectively, and individual locus explained up to 28.26 % of phenotypic variation. Of them, only Rf3, the main restorer-fertility gene of CMS-S, was identified for the three traits simultaneously. In addition, 83 candidate genes within the 100 kb extension regions of these loci were predicted. These results revealed that besides Rf3 multiple genetic loci and mechanisms are involved in the fertility restoration ability to CMS-S. Results in this study would provide important information for understanding the genetic architecture of fertility restoration to CMS-S in maize. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 23% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#19,201,293
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3,124
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,383
of 264,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#22
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.