You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3 |
| Authors |
Kirsten Martin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 76% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 773 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 773 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 107 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 92 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 7% |
| Researcher | 49 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 5% |
| Other | 135 | 17% |
| Unknown | 295 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 160 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 81 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 58 | 8% |
| Engineering | 31 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 26 | 3% |
| Other | 106 | 14% |
| Unknown | 311 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#202,875
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#12
of 3,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,319
of 343,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#1
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.