↓ Skip to main content

Impact of multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy on pre-therapeutic risk assessment in prostate cancer patients candidate for radical prostatectomy

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy on pre-therapeutic risk assessment in prostate cancer patients candidate for radical prostatectomy
Published in
World Journal of Urology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00345-018-2360-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Dell’Oglio, Armando Stabile, Brendan Hermenigildo Dias, Giorgio Gandaglia, Elio Mazzone, Nicola Fossati, Vito Cucchiara, Emanuele Zaffuto, Vincenzo Mirone, Nazareno Suardi, Alexandre Mottrie, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti

Abstract

To assess the current status and future potential of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) on the pretherapeutic risk assessment in prostate cancer patients' candidates for radical prostatectomy. A literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus database was performed. English-language original and review articles were analyzed and summarized after an interactive peer-review process of the panel. Pretherapeutic risk assessment tools should be based on target plus systematic biopsies, where the addition of systematic biopsy (TRUS-Bx) to the mpMRI-target cores is associated with a lower rate of upgrading at final pathology. The combination of mpMRI findings with clinical parameters outperforms models based on clinical parameters alone in the prediction of adverse pathological outcomes and oncological results. This is particularly true when a specialized radiologist is present. The combination of mpMRI findings and clinical parameters should be considered to improve patient stratification in the pretherapeutic risk assessment. There is an urgent need to develop or include MRI data and MRI-TBx findings in available preoperative risk tools. This will allow improving the pretherapeutic risk assessment, providing important additional information for patient-tailored treatment planning and optimizing outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 32%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Computer Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 29 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,536,861
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#1,501
of 2,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,274
of 328,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#48
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.