↓ Skip to main content

Case–Control Study of the Relationship of Functioning to Suicide in a Community-Based Sample of Individuals with Schizophrenia in China

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case–Control Study of the Relationship of Functioning to Suicide in a Community-Based Sample of Individuals with Schizophrenia in China
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10597-011-9460-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Kasckow, Nancy Liu, Michael R. Phillips

Abstract

Suicide is a leading cause of premature death among people with schizophrenia. Some studies indicate that increased difficulties in functioning are associated with suicidality in persons with schizophrenia. We conducted a secondary analysis of 74 suicides (cases) and 24 accidental deaths (controls) among persons with schizophrenia identified in a national psychological autopsy study in China. Between cases and controls, we compared the effect of schizophrenia on work, daily activities, emotions, social relationships and self-care at the time the illness was most severe. There was no difference in the overall maximum dysfunction associated with the illness between groups. None of the 5 measures (work, activities, emotions, relationships, self-care) were different between the two groups. This study of individuals with DSM-IV schizophrenia who died by suicide in a non-western culture only partially supports findings from clinical studies in western cultures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 19%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Computer Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 26%