You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proposal for diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10157-011-0521-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mitsuhiro Kawano, Takako Saeki, Hitoshi Nakashima, Shinichi Nishi, Yutaka Yamaguchi, Satoshi Hisano, Nobuaki Yamanaka, Dai Inoue, Motohisa Yamamoto, Hiroki Takahashi, Hideki Nomura, Takashi Taguchi, Hisanori Umehara, Hirofumi Makino, Takao Saito |
| Abstract |
IgG4-related disease has attracted wide attention recently. It is characterized by a high level of serum IgG4 and dense infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells into multiple organs, with the kidney being one representative target. Although several sets of diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) are available and renal lesion is recognized as an extra-pancreatic manifestation of AIP, it is difficult to differentiate IgG4-related tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) without AIP from other types of TIN. To clarify the entity of IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) and support in-depth studies, the Japanese Society of Nephrology has established a working group to prepare diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 59% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,332,540
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#20
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,837
of 134,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.