↓ Skip to main content

Uncertain diagnosis of Fabry disease: Consensus recommendation on diagnosis in adults with left ventricular hypertrophy and genetic variants of unknown significance

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cardiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uncertain diagnosis of Fabry disease: Consensus recommendation on diagnosis in adults with left ventricular hypertrophy and genetic variants of unknown significance
Published in
International Journal of Cardiology, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

B.E. Smid, L. van der Tol, F. Cecchi, P.M. Elliott, D.A. Hughes, G.E. Linthorst, J. Timmermans, F. Weidemann, M.L. West, M. Biegstraaten, R.H. Lekanne Deprez, S. Florquin, P.G. Postema, B. Tomberli, A.C. van der Wal, M.A. van den Bergh Weerman, C.E. Hollak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Other 14 10%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 49 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#16,579,551
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cardiology
#4,345
of 7,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,491
of 261,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cardiology
#70
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.