↓ Skip to main content

Discovery of Rare Mutations in Autism: Elucidating Neurodevelopmental Mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discovery of Rare Mutations in Autism: Elucidating Neurodevelopmental Mechanisms
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13311-015-0363-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ece D. Gamsiz, Laura N. Sciarra, Abbie M. Maguire, Matthew F. Pescosolido, Laura I. van Dyck, Eric M. Morrow

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a group of highly genetic neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by language, social, cognitive, and behavioral abnormalities. ASD is a complex disorder with a heterogeneous etiology. The genetic architecture of autism is such that a variety of different rare mutations have been discovered, including rare monogenic conditions that involve autistic symptoms. Also, de novo copy number variants and single nucleotide variants contribute to disease susceptibility. Finally, autosomal recessive loci are contributing to our understanding of inherited factors. We will review the progress that the field has made in the discovery of these rare genetic variants in autism. We argue that mutation discovery of this sort offers an important opportunity to identify neurodevelopmental mechanisms in disease. The hope is that these mechanisms will show some degree of convergence that may be amenable to treatment intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 18%
Neuroscience 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,288,711
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#551
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,697
of 277,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.