You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new framework for selecting environmental surrogates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.056 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Lindenmayer, Jennifer Pierson, Philip Barton, Maria Beger, Cristina Branquinho, Aram Calhoun, Tim Caro, Hamish Greig, John Gross, Jani Heino, Malcolm Hunter, Peter Lane, Catherine Longo, Kathy Martin, William H. McDowell, Camille Mellin, Hanna Salo, Ayesha Tulloch, Martin Westgate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 15% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 59 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 26% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,134,205
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#10,710
of 30,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,438
of 278,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#76
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.