You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Height and Breast Cancer Risk: Evidence From Prospective Studies and Mendelian Randomization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djv219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben Zhang, Xiao-Ou Shu, Ryan J Delahanty, Chenjie Zeng, Kyriaki Michailidou, Manjeet K Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Wanqing Wen, Jirong Long, Chun Li, Alison M Dunning, Jenny Chang-Claude, Mitul Shah, Barbara J Perkins, Kamila Czene, Hatef Darabi, Mikael Eriksson, Stig E Bojesen, Børge G Nordestgaard, Sune F Nielsen, Henrik Flyger, Diether Lambrechts, Patrick Neven, Hans Wildiers, Giuseppe Floris, Marjanka K Schmidt, Matti A Rookus, Katja van den Hurk, Wim L A M de Kort, Fergus J Couch, Janet E Olson, Emily Hallberg, Celine Vachon, Anja Rudolph, Petra Seibold, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Julian Peto, Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva, Olivia Fletcher, Nichola Johnson, Heli Nevanlinna, Taru A Muranen, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Jingmei Li, Keith Humphreys, Judith Brand, Pascal Guénel, Thérèse Truong, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Florence Menegaux, Barbara Burwinkel, Frederik Marme, Rongxi Yang, Harald Surowy, Javier Benitez, M Pilar Zamora, Jose I A Perez, Angela Cox, Simon S Cross, Malcolm W R Reed, Irene L Andrulis, Julia A Knight, Gord Glendon, Sandrine Tchatchou, Elinor J Sawyer, Ian Tomlinson, Michael J Kerin, Nicola Miller, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Christopher A Haiman, Brian E Henderson, Fredrick Schumacher, Loic Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Sara Margolin, Maartje J Hooning, John W M Martens, Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst, J Margriet Collée, John L Hopper, Melissa C Southey, Helen Tsimiklis, Carmel Apicella, Susan Slager, Amanda E Toland, Christine B Ambrosone, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Graham G Giles, Roger L Milne, Catriona McLean, Peter A Fasching, Lothar Haeberle, Arif B Ekici, Matthias W Beckmann, Hermann Brenner, Aida Karina Dieffenbach, Volker Arndt, Christa Stegmaier, Anthony J Swerdlow, Alan Ashworth, Nick Orr, Michael Jones, Jonine Figueroa, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Louise Brinton, Jolanta Lissowska, Martine Dumont, Robert Winqvist, Katri Pylkäs, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Mervi Grip, Hiltrud Brauch, Thomas Brüning, Yon-Dschun Ko, Paolo Peterlongo, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernardo Bonanni, Paolo Radice, Natalia Bogdanova, Natalia Antonenkova, Thilo Dörk, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jaana M Hartikainen, Peter Devilee, Caroline Seynaeve, Christi J Van Asperen, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubiński, Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna Durda, Ute Hamann, Diana Torres, Rita K Schmutzler, Susan L Neuhausen, Hoda Anton-Culver, Vessela N Kristensen, Grethe I Grenaker Alnæs, Brandon L Pierce, Peter Kraft, Ulrike Peters, Sara Lindstrom, Daniela Seminara, Stephen Burgess, Habibul Ahsan, Alice S Whittemore, Esther M John, Marilie D Gammon, Kathleen E Malone, Daniel C Tessier, Daniel Vincent, Francois Bacot, Craig Luccarini, Caroline Baynes, Shahana Ahmed, Mel Maranian, Catherine S Healey, Anna González-Neira, Guillermo Pita, M Rosario Alonso, Nuria Álvarez, Daniel Herrero, Paul D P Pharoah, Jacques Simard, Per Hall, David J Hunter, Douglas F Easton, Wei Zheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Czechia | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#357,667
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#231
of 7,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,224
of 280,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#3
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.