↓ Skip to main content

Regional Nerve Blocks For Hip and Femoral Neck Fractures in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,650)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
117 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional Nerve Blocks For Hip and Femoral Neck Fractures in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review
Published in
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1017/cem.2015.75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandon Ritcey, Paul Pageau, Michael Y. Woo, Jeffrey J. Perry

Abstract

Hip and femoral neck fractures are common in elderly patients, who are at an increased risk of complications if their pain is suboptimally managed. This systematic review seeks to determine if regional nerve blocks reduce pain, reduce the need for parenteral opiates, and reduce complications, compared to standard pain management with opiates, acetaminophen, or NSAIDs. Data sources Systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials found 401 articles, of which nine were selected for inclusion. Study selection Randomized controlled trials including adult patients with a hip or femoral neck fracture (Population) who had a 3-in-1 femoral nerve block, traditional femoral nerve block, or fascia iliaca compartment block performed preoperatively (Intervention). Comparison must have been made with standard pain management with opiates, acetaminophen, or NSAIDs (Comparison) and outcomes must have included pain score reduction (Outcome). Data synthesis Eight out of nine studies concluded pain scores were improved with the regional nerve block compared to standard pain management. A significant reduction in parenteral opiate use was seen in five out of six studies. No patients suffered life-threatening complications related to the nerve block; however, more minor complications were under-reported. Most of the studies were at a moderate to high risk of bias. Regional nerve blocks for hip and femoral neck fractures have a benefit in reducing pain and the need for IV opiates. The use of these blocks can be recommended for these patients. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 13%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 52 26%
Unknown 48 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 53 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#351,239
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
#12
of 1,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,272
of 273,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.