↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing the Safety and Efficacy of Food Allergy Immunotherapy: a Review of Adjunctive Therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing the Safety and Efficacy of Food Allergy Immunotherapy: a Review of Adjunctive Therapies
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12016-018-8694-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yamini V. Virkud, Julie Wang, Wayne G. Shreffler

Abstract

Food allergy is a potentially life-threatening condition with no approved curative therapy. A number of food allergen immunotherapies are being investigated in phase II/III trials; however, these are limited in their ability to restore immune tolerance to food allergens and often result in high rates of allergic side effects, sometimes involving anaphylaxis, that may curtail their impact. A variety of adjunctive therapies have been developed in order to enhance the efficacy and/or improve the safety of food allergen immunotherapy through either shifting the immune response from a Th2 polarized response to a Th1 and regulatory T cell dominated response or by blocking downstream effects of the allergic inflammatory response by targeting IgE or mast cell mediators. Upstream therapies that shift towards a Th1/Treg response include toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 agonists (e.g., MPL and GLA), TLR9 agonists (CpG oligonucleotides), nanoparticles encapsulating peanut allergen (with and without adjuvants, such as CpG or rapamycin), Chinese herbal medicine (food allergy herbal formula (FAHF-2)), probiotics, and interferon-gamma. In contrast, anti-IgE therapies such as omalizumab, anti-histamines like ketotifen, and leukotriene receptor antagonists all target the downstream allergic response. Anti-IgE-based therapies appear to be furthest along with probiotics, Chinese herbal medicines, and TLR-4 agonists currently in early phase clinical trials. Meanwhile, nanoparticles represent an innovative delivery vehicle for immunotherapy that could improve both efficacy and decrease allergic side effects. Furthermore, other biologic therapies directed towards the allergic immune response are on the horizon. A number of factors will need to be evaluated in comparing these treatments, including ability to decrease allergic adverse events, safety of the adjunctive therapies themselves, effect on long-term sustained unresponsiveness, and cost. Further phenotyping of food allergy patients may be necessary to determine which ones respond best to each therapy. However, with so many promising adjunctive therapies, it appears likely that clinicians will have a variety of options to optimize the administration of food allergen immunotherapy. We provided a review of these methods, their influence on allergic adverse events, and utility in improving the immunomodulatory effects of food allergen immunotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 27 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#16,272,032
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#525
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,449
of 331,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.