↓ Skip to main content

Sonographic findings of tensor fascia lata tendinopathy: another cause of anterior groin pain

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sonographic findings of tensor fascia lata tendinopathy: another cause of anterior groin pain
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, January 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00256-001-0459-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Bass, D. Connell

Abstract

To describe the sonographic appearances of the normal tensor fascia lata (TFL) origin and to describe the sonographic changes that were present in the TFL of a group of athletes presenting with anterior groin pain. The sonographic appearances of the TFLs of 40 healthy asymptomatic volunteers were evaluated. The TFLs of approximately 200 patients aged between 16 and 55 years presenting with anterior groin pain were evaluated in the course of routine sonographic assessment of the hip. Twelve abnormal TFLs were identified in 12 patients aged between 16 and 53 years. A retrospective review of the appearance of the normal and abnormal tendon with respect to its overall size and echotexture was made. The normal TFL has a thin ribbon-like appearance with a clearly defined fibrillar pattern and a mean anteroposterior (AP) size of 2.1 mm (range 1.5-3.1 mm). In the patient cohort the TFL typically appeared enlarged and contained a cone-shaped area of hypoechogenicity based on the iliac crest within the deep fibers of the origin. The TFL origin was enlarged up to 2 1/2 times its normal size. The mean AP size of the abnormal TFL was 4.7 mm (range 3.1-7.0 mm). Tendinopathy of the TFL is a cause of anterior groin pain. Sonography can be used to depict changes in the TFL, confirming the diagnosis and assessing the severity of the tendinopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Lecturer 5 9%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#950
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,857
of 124,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them