↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the effect of weather on human outdoor perception using Twitter

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the effect of weather on human outdoor perception using Twitter
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00484-018-1574-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Giuffrida, Hanna Lokys, Otto Klemm

Abstract

Human comfort in outdoor spaces (HCOS) is linked to people's psychological responses to environmental variables. Previous studies have established comfort ranges for these variables through interviews and questionnaires, reaching only limited populations. However, larger amounts of data would not only generate more robust results in local studies, but it would also allow for the possibility of creating an approach that could be applied to a wider range of weather conditions and different climates. Therefore, this study describes a new methodology to assess people's perception of weather based on human responses to weather conditions extracted from tweets, with the purpose of establishing comfort ranges for environmental variables. Tweets containing weather-associated keywords were collected, stored, and then linked to real-time meteorological data acquired nearby the locations in which the tweets were posted. Afterwards, people's perception of weather was extracted from the tweets using a classifier trained specifically on weather data that identified irrelevant, neutral, positive, and negative tweets. The obtained tweets and their related atmospheric data were analyzed to establish comfort ranges. The tweets' responses to effective temperature were very similar to those obtained in previous studies, although the peak of comfort is shifted towards the cold stress. Similarly, the tweets' responses to the thermohygrometric index were alike to previous results, but the peak of comfort is shifted towards the heat stress. Regarding the single weather variables under study, the obtained comfort ranges are similar to the ones found in previous research; in particular, the temperature comfort range matches perfectly at 20-22 °C. Therefore, it was concluded that tweets can be used to assess HCOS; not only are the results of this methodology comparable to results obtained in previous studies, but the procedure itself also shows new features and unexpected future applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 5 14%
Computer Science 5 14%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#988
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,330
of 326,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.