Title |
Accelerated partial breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique compared to whole breast irradiation for patients aged 70 years or older: subgroup analysis from a randomized phase 3 trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10549-015-3565-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Icro Meattini, Calogero Saieva, Livia Marrazzo, Lucia Di Brina, Stefania Pallotta, Monica Mangoni, Fiammetta Meacci, Benedetta Bendinelli, Giulio Francolini, Isacco Desideri, Carla De Luca Cardillo, Vieri Scotti, Ilaria Francesca Furfaro, Francesca Rossi, Daniela Greto, Pierluigi Bonomo, Donato Casella, Marco Bernini, Luis Sanchez, Lorenzo Orzalesi, Roberta Simoncini, Jacopo Nori, Simonetta Bianchi, Lorenzo Livi |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to report the efficacy and the safety profile on the subset of selected early breast cancer (BC) patients aged 70 years or older from a single-center phase 3 trial comparing whole breast irradiation (WBI) to accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique. Between 2005 and 2013, 520 patients aged more than 40 years old were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either WBI or APBI in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients were women with early BC (maximum diameter 2.5 cm) suitable for breast conserving surgery. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02104895. A total of 117 patients aged 70 years or more were analyzed (58 in the WBI arm, 59 in the APBI arm). At a median follow-up of 5-years (range 3.4-7.0), the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate was 1.9 % in both groups. No significant difference between the two groups was identified (log-rank test p = 0.96). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates in the WBI group and APBI group were 6.1 and 1.9 %, respectively (p = 0.33). The APBI group presented significantly better results in terms of acute skin toxicity, considering both any grade (p = 0.0001) and grade 2 or higher (p = 0.0001). Our subgroup analyses showed a very low rate and no significant difference in terms of IBTR, using both WBI and APBI. A significant impact on patients compliance in terms of acute and early late toxicity was shown, which could translate in a consistent improvement of overall quality of life. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 17% |
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 29 | 33% |