↓ Skip to main content

Stigmatisation, perceived barriers to care, help seeking and the mental health of British Military personnel

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stigmatisation, perceived barriers to care, help seeking and the mental health of British Military personnel
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00127-015-1118-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norman Jones, Mary Keeling, Gursimran Thandi, Neil Greenberg

Abstract

The relationship between mental health symptoms, stigmatising beliefs about mental health and help seeking is complex and poorly understood. 1636 UK Armed Forces personnel provided study data immediately after deployment (T1) and approximately 6 months later (T2). Stigmatising beliefs were assessed using an eight-item scale previously used in studies of UK military personnel. Symptoms of probable common mental disorder, probable post-traumatic stress disorder and subjective stressful, emotional, relationship and family problems were evaluated at T1 and T2. Help seeking during deployment was assessed at T1 and post-deployment help seeking at T2. Alcohol use and subjective alcohol problems were assessed at T2 only. Reporting a probable mental health disorder or potentially harmful alcohol use following deployment was both significantly associated with higher levels of stigmatising beliefs. The reported degree of stigma was associated with changes in mental health symptom levels; compared to those who were never classified as a probable mental health disorder case, recovered cases experienced significantly lower levels of stigmatisation, whereas new onset cases reported significantly higher levels. The way that individuals report mental health stigmatisation is not static; rather stigma fluctuates in proportion to the frequency and severity of psychological symptoms. These results suggest that public health stigma-reduction strategies which aim to promote engagement with mental health services should be focused towards people who are experiencing worsening mental health. Our results suggest that willing volunteers who have recovered from a mental-ill-health episode may be well placed to assist in the delivery of such a strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 43 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 49 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#19,201,293
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2,200
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,974
of 270,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.