↓ Skip to main content

Clinical impact of computed tomography in the emergency department in nontraumatic chest and abdominal conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Emergency Radiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical impact of computed tomography in the emergency department in nontraumatic chest and abdominal conditions
Published in
Emergency Radiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10140-018-1592-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori, Matteo Brambati, Carmelo Messina, Giovanni Mauri, Giovanni Di Leo, Enzo Silvestri, Francesco Sardanelli, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical impact of CT scan in modifying the clinical management in patients referred to the emergency department. We prospectively evaluated 300 patients (177 males, 63 ± 18 years old) admitted in the emergency department (ED) of a single institution, who underwent a CT examination for thoracic and/or abdominal complains. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Hypothesized outcome prior to CT scan and final management (i.e., discharge, short observation in the ED, hospitalization, and department of admission) were compared. After CT examination, a major variation in diagnosis occurred in 37% of cases and clinical management changed in 43%, occurring in 51% of patients who underwent abdominal CT, in 40% of chest CT, and in 29% of chest/abdominal CT (P = 0.015). Department of hospitalization changed in 26% of cases (P < 0.001). Clinical impact of CT scan was significantly associated (P = 0.001) with the color code at admission. In particular, the more severe was the clinical condition, the lower was the variation of management after CT examination. This work confirms the crucial role of CT examination in the management of nontraumatic patients admitted to the ED, both in terms of better clarifying the diagnosis and in influencing the clinical management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Radiology
#452
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,859
of 333,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Radiology
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.