↓ Skip to main content

Review: the energetic value of zooplankton and nekton species of the Southern Ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review: the energetic value of zooplankton and nekton species of the Southern Ocean
Published in
Marine Biology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00227-018-3386-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fokje L. Schaafsma, Yves Cherel, Hauke Flores, Jan Andries van Franeker, Mary-Anne Lea, Ben Raymond, Anton P. van de Putte

Abstract

Understanding the energy flux through food webs is important for estimating the capacity of marine ecosystems to support stocks of living resources. The energy density of species involved in trophic energy transfer has been measured in a large number of small studies, scattered over a 40-year publication record. Here, we reviewed energy density records of Southern Ocean zooplankton, nekton and several benthic taxa, including previously unpublished data. Comparing measured taxa, energy densities were highest in myctophid fishes (ranging from 17.1 to 39.3 kJ g-1 DW), intermediate in crustaceans (7.1 to 25.3 kJ g-1 DW), squid (16.2 to 24.0 kJ g-1 DW) and other fish families (14.8 to 29.9 kJ g-1 DW), and lowest in jelly fish (10.8 to 18.0 kJ g-1 DW), polychaetes (9.2 to 14.2 kJ g-1 DW) and chaetognaths (5.0-11.7 kJ g-1 DW). Data reveals differences in energy density within and between species related to size, age and other life cycle parameters. Important taxa in Antarctic food webs, such as copepods, squid and small euphausiids, remain under-sampled. The variability in energy density of Electrona antarctica was likely regional rather than seasonal, although for many species with limited data it remains difficult to disentangle regional and seasonal variability. Models are provided to estimate energy density more quickly using a species' physical parameters. It will become increasingly important to close knowledge gaps to improve the ability of bioenergetic and food web models to predict changes in the capacity of Antarctic ecosystems to support marine life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 6 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 39%
Environmental Science 22 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,724,713
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#2,598
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,166
of 334,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#19
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.