↓ Skip to main content

The Treachery of Images: How René Magritte Informs Medical Education

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Treachery of Images: How René Magritte Informs Medical Education
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1581-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Delese Wear, Joseph Zarconi

Abstract

Using René Magritte's well-known painting The Treachery of Images (This is not a pipe), we argue that the current focus on competencies throughout medical education can sometimes lead educators to rely too heavily on scores, checkmarks, or other forms of assessment that come to be viewed as equivalents for the actual existence of what is being measured. Magritte insisted that the image he created on the canvas was not a pipe but rather a representation of a pipe, an important distinction for educators to remember as we seek ways to evaluate trainees' attainment of the fundamental knowledge and skills of the profession. We also urge that the focus on broader skills, values, flexibility, reflection, and insight development should fall outside the net of a competency orientation in a supportive environment spared from traditional assessment methods, using a classroom in undergraduate medical education as an example of working toward this end.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 13 35%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 41%
Social Sciences 6 16%
Arts and Humanities 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2011.
All research outputs
#14,608,132
of 23,996,152 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,393
of 7,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,686
of 186,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#28
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,996,152 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.