↓ Skip to main content

Familial hypercholesterolaemia: A global call to arms

Overview of attention for article published in Atherosclerosis (00219150), September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Familial hypercholesterolaemia: A global call to arms
Published in
Atherosclerosis (00219150), September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.09.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio J. Vallejo-Vaz, Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai, Della Cole, G. Kees Hovingh, John J.P. Kastelein, Pedro Mata, Frederick J. Raal, Raul D. Santos, Handrean Soran, Gerald F. Watts, Marianne Abifadel, Carlos A. Aguilar-Salinas, Asif Akram, Fahad Alnouri, Rodrigo Alonso, Khalid Al-Rasadi, Maciej Banach, Martin P. Bogsrud, Mafalda Bourbon, Eric Bruckert, Josip Car, Pablo Corral, Olivier Descamps, Hans Dieplinger, Ronen Durst, Tomas Freiberger, Isabel M. Gaspar, Jaques Genest, Mariko Harada-Shiba, Lixin Jiang, Meral Kayikcioglu, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Gustavs Latkovskis, Ulrich Laufs, Evangelos Liberopoulos, Lennart Nilsson, Børge G. Nordestgaard, John M. O'Donoghue, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Heribert Schunkert, Abdulla Shehab, Mario Stoll, Ta-Chen Su, Andrey Susekov, Elisabeth Widén, Alberico L. Catapano, Kausik K. Ray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 126 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 13 10%
Professor 10 7%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 42 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,830,459
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Atherosclerosis (00219150)
#555
of 5,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,853
of 285,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Atherosclerosis (00219150)
#8
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.