↓ Skip to main content

Exploring, exploiting and evolving diversity of aquatic ecosystem models: a community perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Ecology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 596)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring, exploiting and evolving diversity of aquatic ecosystem models: a community perspective
Published in
Aquatic Ecology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10452-015-9544-1
Authors

Annette B. G. Janssen, George B. Arhonditsis, Arthur Beusen, Karsten Bolding, Louise Bruce, Jorn Bruggeman, Raoul-Marie Couture, Andrea S. Downing, J. Alex Elliott, Marieke A. Frassl, Gideon Gal, Daan J. Gerla, Matthew R. Hipsey, Fenjuan Hu, Stephen C. Ives, Jan H. Janse, Erik Jeppesen, Klaus D. Jöhnk, David Kneis, Xiangzhen Kong, Jan J. Kuiper, Moritz K. Lehmann, Carsten Lemmen, Deniz Özkundakci, Thomas Petzoldt, Karsten Rinke, Barbara J. Robson, René Sachse, Sebastiaan A. Schep, Martin Schmid, Huub Scholten, Sven Teurlincx, Dennis Trolle, Tineke A. Troost, Anne A. Van Dam, Luuk P. A. Van Gerven, Mariska Weijerman, Scott A. Wells, Wolf M. Mooij

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Australia 4 2%
Mexico 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 245 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 21%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Professor 13 5%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 43 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 96 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 15%
Engineering 20 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 6%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 66 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,795,302
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Ecology
#12
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,665
of 289,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Ecology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.