↓ Skip to main content

Illness intrusiveness and subjective well-being in patients with glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Illness intrusiveness and subjective well-being in patients with glioblastoma
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11060-015-1943-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim Edelstein, Linda Coate, Christine Massey, Natalie C. Jewitt, Warren P. Mason, Gerald M. Devins

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult CNS malignancy but its impact on quality of life (QOL) is poorly understood. In other patient populations, illness intrusiveness (the extent to which disease and treatment disrupts valued activities and interests) is associated with low subjective well-being, after controlling for disease and treatment variables. In this cross-sectional cohort study, we examined the relations among illness intrusiveness, disease burden, and subjective well-being in GBM. 73 GBM patients completed validated self-report measures of depression, positive affect, illness intrusiveness, and health-related QOL. Responses were compared to data from six other cancer groups using repeated measures analyses of variance. Hierarchical multiple-regression analyses tested the hypothesis that illness intrusiveness accounts for well-being after controlling for the effects of disease burden. GBM patients reported less positive affect, more depression, and more illness intrusiveness than people with other cancers. Illness intrusiveness correlated with depression and (low) positive affect. Associations among cancer symptoms, depression, and positive affect decreased when illness intrusiveness was added to regression equations. Good performance status and high cancer-symptom burden were associated with illness intrusiveness and depression. GBM patients report greater distress, lower positive affect, and more illness intrusiveness than people with other cancers. Subjective well-being is mediated in part by illness intrusiveness in this population. In addition to medical treatment, efforts to help patients remain engaged in valued activities and interests may help preserve QOL after the diagnosis of a GBM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Psychology 12 13%
Unspecified 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,428,159
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,236
of 2,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,335
of 274,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#44
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.