↓ Skip to main content

Relevance of evolutionary history for food web structure

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relevance of evolutionary history for food web structure
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2011
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2011.2149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Eklöf, Matthew R. Helmus, M. Moore, Stefano Allesina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
France 3 2%
Switzerland 3 2%
Sweden 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 177 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 27%
Researcher 38 19%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 53%
Environmental Science 41 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 26 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,410,682
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#9,855
of 11,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,953
of 142,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#68
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.