↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
106 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2015
DOI 10.1001/jama.2015.12009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew R. L. Stevenson, Michael J. Solomon, John W. Lumley, Peter Hewett, Andrew D. Clouston, Val J. Gebski, Lucy Davies, Kate Wilson, Wendy Hague, John Simes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 416 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 15%
Other 54 13%
Student > Postgraduate 48 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Student > Master 32 8%
Other 100 24%
Unknown 90 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 261 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Engineering 6 1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 115 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#244,926
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,231
of 36,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,217
of 292,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#63
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.