↓ Skip to main content

Roxithromycin regulates intestinal microbiota and alters colonic epithelial gene expression

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roxithromycin regulates intestinal microbiota and alters colonic epithelial gene expression
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9257-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng Zhang, Xuanwei Li, Liu Liu, Lijuan Gao, Shiyi Ou, Jianming Luo, Xichun Peng

Abstract

The specialty of gastroenterology will be affected profoundly by the ability to modify the gastrointestinal microbiota through the use of antibiotics. This study investigated the in vivo effect of roxithromycin on gut bacteria and gene expression of colonic epithelial cells (CECs) using microbial 16S rDNA and colonic epithelial cell RNA sequencing, respectively. The results showed that roxithromycin distinctly lowered the microbial diversity in both the small intestine and cecum and altered the compositions of bacteria at both the phylum and genus levels, including the reduction of some bacteria beneficial to the hosts' health. Eight decreased and 8 increased genera in the small intestine and 17 decreased and 4 increased genera of bacteria in the cecum were most affected by roxithromycin consumption. This consumption further altered the CECs' expression of multiple genes. Thirty-one genes, which were significantly enriched in seven KEGG pathways and related to immune response, wound healing, and fibrosis, were significantly affected. Roxithromycin ingestion in healthy hosts, therefore, might lead to some undesirable consequences via affecting hosts' gut microbiota and CECs. Our work offers a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of consuming roxithromycin on human health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,964,151
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#946
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,467
of 334,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#14
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.