↓ Skip to main content

Molecular characterization of a new gammapartitivirus isolated from the citrus-pathogenic fungus Penicillium digitatum

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular characterization of a new gammapartitivirus isolated from the citrus-pathogenic fungus Penicillium digitatum
Published in
Archives of Virology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00705-018-3951-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhu Yang, Hui Geng, Yongliang Zheng, Yongze Yuan, Menglan Wang, Jiali Mao, Tingfu Zhang, Yuhui Niu, Deli Liu

Abstract

To date, partitiviruses, including gammapartitiviruses, have been extensively studied in various fungal hosts but have not been reported in Penicillium digitatum (also called green mold, the pathogenic fungus infecting citrus). In the present work, we isolated and molecularly characterized a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) partitivirus from citrus green mold, which we have named "Penicillium digitatum gammapartitivirus 1" (PdGV1). The bisegmented genome of PdGV1 contains two dsRNA segments (dsRNA1 and dsRNA2) with a length of 1795 bp and 1622 bp, respectively. Each of the two genomic dsRNAs contains a single open reading frame encoding a putative RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and a coat protein (CP), respectively. Phylogenetic analysis based on RdRp and CP sequences showed that PdGV1 clustered with mycoviruses belonging to the genus Gammapartitivirus, family Partitiviridae, e.g., Penicillium stoloniferum virus S. The 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs) of the PdGV1 genomic dsRNAs both contained unique conserved RNA motifs that have never been found in any other partitivirus. This is the first report of a new gammapartitivirus that infects the citrus-pathogenic fungus P. digitatum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Librarian 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Mathematics 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#3,422
of 4,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,396
of 330,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#64
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.