You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bioresorption of Porous 3D Matrices Based on Collagen in Liver and Muscular Tissue
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cell and Tissue Biology, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1134/s1990519x18030094 |
Authors |
P. V. Popryadukhin, G. Y. Yukina, I. P. Dobrovolskaya, E. M. Ivankova, V. E. Yudin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 29% |
Other | 2 | 29% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 3 | 43% |
Materials Science | 1 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#542,961
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Biology
#2
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,355
of 328,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them