↓ Skip to main content

A Random Forest classifier-based approach in the detection of abnormalities in the retina

Overview of attention for article published in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Random Forest classifier-based approach in the detection of abnormalities in the retina
Published in
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11517-018-1878-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Tamojit Chatterjee, Sreeparna Banerjee

Abstract

Classification of abnormalities from medical images using computer-based approaches is of growing interest in medical imaging. Timely detection of abnormalities due to diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration is required in order to prevent the prognosis of the disease. Computer-aided systems using machine learning are becoming interesting to ophthalmologists and researchers. We present here one such technique, the Random Forest classifier, to aid medical practitioners in accurate diagnosis of the diseases. A computer-aided diagnosis system is proposed for detecting retina abnormalities, which combines K means-based segmentation of the retina image, after due preprocessing, followed by machine learning techniques, using several low level and statistical features. Abnormalities in the retina that are classified are caused by age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. Performance measures used in the analysis are accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-measure, and Mathew correlation coefficient. A comparison with another machine learning technique, the Naïve Bayes classifier shows that the classification achieved by Random Forest classifier is 93.58% and it outperforms Naïve Bayes classifier which yields an accuracy of 83.63%. Graphical abstract Random Forest classifier for abnormality detection in retina images.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 35 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 25 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Engineering 6 7%
Unspecified 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 35 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#1,899
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,014
of 340,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.