You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extreme climatic conditions and health service utilisation across rural and metropolitan New South Wales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Biometeorology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00484-017-1313-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward Jegasothy, Rhydwyn McGuire, John Nairn, Robert Fawcett, Benjamin Scalley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,053,576
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#162
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,769
of 327,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.