↓ Skip to main content

Rivaroxaban in Patients with Heart Failure, Sinus Rhythm, and Coronary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
536 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
282 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rivaroxaban in Patients with Heart Failure, Sinus Rhythm, and Coronary Disease
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1808848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faiez Zannad, Stefan D Anker, William M Byra, John G F Cleland, Min Fu, Mihai Gheorghiade, Carolyn S P Lam, Mandeep R Mehra, James D Neaton, Christopher C Nessel, Theodore E Spiro, Dirk J van Veldhuisen, Barry Greenberg

Abstract

Background Heart failure is associated with activation of thrombin-related pathways, which predicts a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that treatment with rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, could reduce thrombin generation and improve outcomes for patients with worsening chronic heart failure and underlying coronary artery disease. Methods In this double-blind, randomized trial, 5022 patients who had chronic heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less, coronary artery disease, and elevated plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides and who did not have atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo in addition to standard care after treatment for an episode of worsening heart failure. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The principal safety outcome was fatal bleeding or bleeding into a critical space with a potential for causing permanent disability. Results Over a median follow-up period of 21.1 months, the primary end point occurred in 626 (25.0%) of 2507 patients assigned to rivaroxaban and in 658 (26.2%) of 2515 patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.05; P=0.27). No significant difference in all-cause mortality was noted between the rivaroxaban group and the placebo group (21.8% and 22.1%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.10). The principal safety outcome occurred in 18 patients who took rivaroxaban and in 23 who took placebo (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49; P=0.48). Conclusions Rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily was not associated with a significantly lower rate of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke than placebo among patients with worsening chronic heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary artery disease, and no atrial fibrillation. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; COMMANDER HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01877915 .).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 536 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 373 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 15%
Other 41 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 7%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Other 85 23%
Unknown 107 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 167 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 134 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 448. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#63,605
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,947
of 32,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,225
of 345,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#55
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.