You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosomes, loaded with miR-126, promoted deep vein thrombosis resolution and recanalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13287-018-0952-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiacheng Sun, Zhiwei Zhang, Teng Ma, Ziying Yang, Jinlong Zhang, Xuan Liu, Da Lu, Zhenya Shen, Junjie Yang, Qingyou Meng |
| Abstract |
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is caused by blood clotting in the deep veins. Thrombosis resolution and recanalization can be accelerated by endothelial progenitor cells. In this report, we investigated the effects of miR-126-loaded EPC-derived exosomes (miR-126-Exo) on EPCs function and venous thrombus resolution. In vitro promotional effect of miR-126-Exo on the migration and tube incorporation ability of EPCs was investigated via transwell assay and tube formation assay. In addition, a mouse venous thrombosis model was constructed and treated with miR-126-Exo to clarify the therapeutic effect of miR-126-Exo by histological analysis. Lastly, this study predicted a target gene of miR-126 using target prediction algorithms and confirmed it by luciferase activity assay, RT-qPCR, and Western blot. Transwell assay and tube formation assay indicated that miR-126-Exo could enhance the migration and tube incorporation ability of EPCs. Moreover, in vivo study manifested enhanced thrombus organization and recanalization after miR-126-Exo treatment. Meanwhile, we identified that Protocadherin 7 as a target gene of miR-126. To sum up, our results demonstrated that EPC-derived exosomes loaded with miR-126 significantly promoted thrombus resolution in an animal model of venous thrombosis, indicating exosomes as a promising potential vehicle carrying therapeutic molecules for DVT therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,357
of 2,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,546
of 334,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#32
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.