You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Characterization of the salivary microbiome in patients with pancreatic cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
PeerJ, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.7717/peerj.1373 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pedro J. Torres, Erin M. Fletcher, Sean M. Gibbons, Michael Bouvet, Kelly S. Doran, Scott T. Kelley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 46% |
Russia | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 15% |
Unknown | 35 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 40 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,410,691
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#4,696
of 15,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,774
of 300,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#95
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.