↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Recent Studies for the Treatment of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Recent Studies for the Treatment of Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11910-018-0872-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jochen A. Sembill, Hagen B. Huttner, Joji B. Kuramatsu

Abstract

The present review will cover most recent and important studies on acute treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Overly pessimistic prognostication in ICH may deny meaningful recovery achieved by specialized neurocritical care. Hematoma enlargement represents the most important target of acute ICH care, which is reduced by aggressive blood pressure management (targeting a systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg) and appropriate hemostatic treatment especially in anticoagulation-associated ICH (INR reversal using prothrombin complex concentrates, eventually idarucizumab, andexanet, or tranexamic acid). Surgical treatment strategies involving fibrinolytics either used for direct hematoma lysis or used for intraventricular clot removal with/without additional lumbar drainage show great promise. Further novel treatment strategies are underway and need validation or evaluation strongly warranting well-designed future ICH research. Several randomized and large-sized observational studies have considerably expanded the field and the evidence on how to treat acute ICH patients. Yet, the one breakthrough intervention to improve functional outcome is still missing, though various treatment concepts possibly interacting with one another have been evaluated and such treatment bundle may improve patients' outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,532,290
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#849
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,776
of 333,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#23
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.