You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Extended residence times for foraminifera in a marine-influenced terrestrial archaeological deposit and implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.11.008 |
Authors |
Texas Nagel, Daniel Rosendahl, Quan Hua, Patrick Moss, Craig Sloss, Fiona Petchey, Sean Ulm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 29% |
United States | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 18% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Materials Science | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,963,672
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
#956
of 2,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,810
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.