You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preliminary results from structural systems biology approach in Tetrahymena thermophila reveal novel perspectives for this toxicological model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Microbiology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00203-018-1571-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christos T. Chasapis |
| Abstract |
Tetrahymena is a unicellular microbial eukaryotic organism that has been used extensively in toxicology and environmental research. This work attempts to model for the first time the wiring of proteins involved in cellular mechanisms of Cd toxicity in Tetrahymena thermophila. 1975 high-confidence PPIs between 68 Cd-binding proteins and 422 partners were inferred through a novel structural systems biology approach that utilizes comparative analysis between Tetrahymena and other eukaryotes for which experimentally supported protein interactomes exist. The PPIs of the potential network were confirmed by known domain interactions in the Protein Data Bank and its topological characteristics were compared with publicly available experimental information for T. thermophila. To experimentally validate the robustness of the proposed PPI network, the interaction between the two most interconnected hub proteins was detected through GST pull-down assay. Potential effects on Tetrahymena's cellular and metabolic processes by PPIs involving Cd-binding proteins were uncovered. Furthermore, 244 PPIs in which Cd-binding proteins or/and their partners are encoded by orthologs of human disease genes in T. thermophila, but not in yeast, were identified and analyzed. The findings suggest that Tetrahymena could be possibly a useful model for an improved understanding of molecular mechanisms of Cd toxicity in human diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,424,488
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#1,729
of 2,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,656
of 336,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,807 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.