↓ Skip to main content

Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 2,108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
490 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe La Torre, Alessia Esposito, Iliana Sciarra, Marta Chiappetta

Abstract

Techno-stress (TS) is an emergent phenomenon closely related to the pervasive use of information and communication technologies in modern society. Despite numerous studies existing in the literature, only few comprehensive reviews have been performed, which has led to fragmented information about TS. This systematic review aimed to clarify the definition, the symptoms, and the risk factors of TS, focusing on the differences between work-related and non-work-related sources of TS. A comprehensive literature review of three electronic databases was performed according to the PRISMA statement. 'Technostress' was used as the only keyword. In the qualitative synthesis, 105 studies were included: 84 cross-sectional studies, 8 experimental studies and 13 reviews (11 narrative and 2 systematic reviews). 70 studies (67%) addressed work-related TS, 26 (25%) addressed non-work-related TS, while 8 (8%) did not differentiate between work and non-work fields. The presence and level of TS among individuals was described in 38 studies (29%), whilst the techno-stressors, and the consequences of TS, were described in 53 studies (51%). The antecedents of TS were reported in 47 studies (45%), its moderators in 40 studies (38%), whilst its symptoms in only 11 studies (10%). TS affects both professional and private life. It can determine a reduction in job and life satisfaction and in productivity, and is often associated to the occurrence of psychological and behavioral disorders. Efforts should be made to recognize situations with a high risk of causing TS, to prevent its progressive development in a prospective way using mainly cohort studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 490 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 490 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 10%
Student > Bachelor 45 9%
Lecturer 26 5%
Researcher 25 5%
Other 74 15%
Unknown 211 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 78 16%
Psychology 57 12%
Social Sciences 30 6%
Computer Science 20 4%
Engineering 17 3%
Other 73 15%
Unknown 215 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,366,357
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#49
of 2,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,517
of 346,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.