You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intracellular dynamics of topoisomerase I inhibitor, CPT-11, by slit-scanning confocal Raman microscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, April 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00418-009-0594-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yoshinori Harada, Ping Dai, Yoshihisa Yamaoka, Mitsugu Ogawa, Hideo Tanaka, Kazuto Nosaka, Kenichi Akaji, Tetsuro Takamatsu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 34% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 23% |
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,972,609
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#171
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,365
of 97,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.