↓ Skip to main content

Facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme delivered via telephone calls or text messages

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme delivered via telephone calls or text messages
Published in
Trials, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2871-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar, Seema Mihrshahi, Li Ming Wen, Sarah Taki, Greer Bennett, Louise A. Baur, Chris Rissel

Abstract

Recruitment of pregnant women into trials is a challenge exacerbated by a number of factors, including strict eligibility criteria. There has been little in-depth examination of the recruitment process to trials involving pregnant women. This paper presents the findings of a study conducted to identify facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to the Communicating Healthy Beginnings Advice by Telephone (CHAT) randomised controlled trial, which aims to reduce the prevalence of infant and childhood obesity. Data were collected from (1) administration of a short questionnaire to women at the time of recruitment exploring women's reasons for consent and non-consent; (2) interviews with recruiters to capture recruiters' experiences of the recruitment process; and (3) analysis of field notes taken by recruiters on the number of women approached/recruited and reasons as to why they did not consent to participate. Data obtained were triangulated to gain insights into the process of recruiting pregnant women. A total of 1155 pregnant women (mean gestational age 31.5 weeks) were enrolled over 5 months. The main reasons for women consenting to participate in the study were convenience in programme delivery mode via telephone calls or text messages, altruism and because the programme was free of charge. The main reasons for women not consenting were lack of interest, language challenges/difficulty speaking English and some felt they did not need information and support due to prior experience as a mother. Facilitators included organisational support, rapport with recruiters and some women with no other children who needed advice. Despite the challenges, the mode of delivery of intervention via telephone calls or text messages, the minimal effort required of women to participate, organisational support from the lead site and recruiters' knowledge of and commitment towards the trial contributed towards successful recruitment. Despite some challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme, some of the facilitators in recruitment included mode of delivery of the intervention programme via telephone calls or text messages, the minimal effort required for women to participate, organisational support from the lead site, and recruiters' knowledge of and commitment towards the trial. The CHAT RCT is registered with the Australian Clinical Trial Registry ( ACTRN12616001470482p ); Ethics Review Committee of Sydney Local Health District (Protocol No. X16-0360 & LNR/16/RPAH/495).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 57 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Psychology 15 10%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 63 42%