↓ Skip to main content

Burden of cardiovascular disease in Japanese cancer patients and survivors: a single cancer-center study in Niigata City

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Burden of cardiovascular disease in Japanese cancer patients and survivors: a single cancer-center study in Niigata City
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10147-018-1341-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Okura, Tsugumi Takayama, Kazuyuki Ozaki, Hiroshi Tanaka, Hiroshi Seki, Tatsuya Takenouchi, Nobuaki Sato, Tohru Minamino

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are major causes of death in Japan. As most CVDs are chronic and often aggravate, long-term follow-up is necessary. Although some cancer patients and survivors have CVD, its prognostic significance and prevalence are unknown. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study at our center to determine the prevalence of cancer patients with CVD. In 2015, our 10-year (2005-2014) cancer registry was summarized. Comorbidities including left ventricular dysfunction, atrial fibrillation (AF), ischemic heart disease, aortic stenosis, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and elevation of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were examined. In total, 26,235 de novo cancer patients were registered and 16,130 survived until January 1, 2015. The 5-year survival rate was 64.0% for all cancer patients and 44.2% for cancer patients with CVD. Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusting for age, cancer stage, and body mass index revealed that AF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.219, male; P = 0.038], VTE (HR 1.517, male; P = 0.003 and HR 2.089, female; P < 0.001), and NT-proBNP elevation (HR 1.861, female; P = 0.002) were significantly associated with death. The CVD prevalence among cancer survivors in 2015 was 8.7% vs 3.5% for males vs females. AF was the most common CVD (prevalence: male, 4.0%; female, 1.0%). The prevalence of most CVD in adults increased progressively with age, with male predominance (12.1% for male and 7.5% for female patients in the 80 s age group). One in 10 elderly cancer survivors has serious CVD. AF, VTE, and heart failure were critical comorbidities. Cardiologists and cancer-care providers should recognize CVD presence and monitor patients closely, providing medications or interventions concurrently with cancer therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 18 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,425,183
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#341
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,267
of 337,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.