↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Glyphosate-, Glufosinate- and Flazasulfuron-Based Herbicides on Soil Microorganisms in a Vineyard

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Glyphosate-, Glufosinate- and Flazasulfuron-Based Herbicides on Soil Microorganisms in a Vineyard
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00128-018-2438-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Mandl, Clemens Cantelmo, Edith Gruber, Florian Faber, Barbara Friedrich, Johann G. Zaller

Abstract

In a vineyard we examined the effects of broad-spectrum herbicides with three different active ingredients (glyphosate, glufosinate, flazasulfuron) on soil microorganisms. Mechanical weeding served as control treatment. Treatments were applied within grapevine rows and soil samples taken from there in 10-20 cm depth 77 days after application. Fungi were analyzed using classical sequencing technology and bacteria using next-generation sequencing. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) comprising bacteria, yeasts and molds was higher under flazasulfuron compared to all other treatments which had similar CFU levels. Abundance of the fungus Mucor was higher under flazasulfuron than glufosinate and mechanical weeding; Mucor was absent under glyphosate. Several other fungi taxa were exclusively found under a specific treatment. Up to 160 different bacteria species were found - some of them for the first time in vineyard soils. Total bacterial counts under herbicides were on average 260% higher than under mechanical weeding; however due to high variability this was not statistically significant. We suggest that herbicide-induced alterations of soil microorganisms could have knock-on effects on other parts of the grapevine system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 45%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,918,919
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#812
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,027
of 345,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#5
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.